Voters
in France and Greece sent an inescapable signal to the euro zone:
austerity. Austerity is basically a policy of deficit cuts by
lowering spending often through a reduction in the amount of benefits
and public services. In france and Greece they showed that the
average guy on the street understands economics better than the
people in power. Instead of reducing debts and returning the European
economy to health, the all-Austerity approach to solving the debt
crisis was sending the weaker economies of Europe into a death spiral
of recession, unemployment, and ultimately continued strain on
national finances.
the problem is that whatever the verdict of the ballot box, Europe can’t
avoid austerity. Its indebted
governments
can’t simply return to spending and borrowing as they had in the
past. Financial markets just wouldn’t stand for it. So the question
going forward is not what replaces austerity, but what new mix of
policies along with austerity are needed to restore prospects for
growth, fix national finances and quell the debt crisis.
There
is a case to be made that the problem with austerity is not the
austerity itself, but the pace at which it is being imposed. Rather
than a mad rush to meet euro-zone deficit limits, more flexibility is
needed to allow governments to adjust over a longer period of time
and benefit from economic recover
It's a tricky situation, and economists cannot even agree on what to do with the EU crisis. I don't think that it is my place to comment because I don't live the realities that those people do. Austerity measures are harsh, but continued spending will only prolonge the problem. There must be some sort of middle ground that they can agree on.
ReplyDelete